Thaisa Grana Pedretti vs Ana Candiotto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When examining second serve effectiveness, Pedretti holds a slight edge with a 41.16% success rate, surpassing Candiotto's 38.36%. Does this suggest Pedretti has a stronger hold on the game? Quite possibly, as there's a high correlation between second serve performance and match outcomes.
• In return games, Pedretti again shows a slight advantage by winning 49.58% of opponents' second serves, compared to Candiotto's 48.3%. However, on first serve returns, Candiotto leads with 34.2% over Pedretti’s 32.97%.
• Under pressure, Pedretti demonstrates superior breakpoint saving ability, managing to save 50.56% of breakpoints, while Candiotto saves only 38.8%. This is crucial for in-game prediction.
• Overall, Pedretti has a slightly better match win rate over the past year at 57.14% compared to Candiotto’s 55.56%.
• Pedretti excels on Indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas, for Candiotto, clay is the best-performing surface with a 50% win rate.
• Regarding tournament levels, Candiotto dominates at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events with a 75% win rate. In contrast, Pedretti competes more in the Challenger/ITF > $10K tournaments, where they achieve a 57.14% win rate.
• In direct head-to-head competition, Pedretti leads with one win in their only previous encounter, which occurred on clay.
• Assessing opponent quality, Candiotto has faced tougher competitors, with an average opponent rank of 348.43 compared to Pedretti's 430.02.
• In deciding sets against all opponents over the past year, Pedretti wins 58%, outpacing Candiotto's 42%.
• Candiotto has a slight tiebreak advantage, having won the only tiebreak they’ve played against Pedretti, but Pedretti is more effective in converting breakpoints at 53.66%, compared to Candiotto’s 40.68%.

Editorial Prediction (September 5, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the players, several key statistical areas highlight small but significant differences. Pedretti slightly outperforms Candiotto in several facets of their game, particularly under pressure with breakpoint defense and second serve points won.

Candiotto's strength lies in higher-level opponent performance and clay court specialization, but this may not suffice given Pedretti’s overall consistency and ability to capitalize on opportunities.

Having a better history in deciding sets and breakpoint conversion, along with a previous head-to-head victory, tips the scales in favor of Pedretti.

Considering the various factors, Pedretti is more poised to win this next matchup against Candiotto.